Question

Why is regulating someone’s ability to shag, who they can shag, why they can shag etc deemed more important than... I don’t know, regulating weapons of mass destruction?

( Blather, blather, blather )

I’ll just get back to this essay then...

The Gay Agenda strikes again!

"If gay people didnt announce they were gay there wouldnt be any problems!!!!"

"damn good point. i mean i have no problem with gays/lezbians/bi's, but when they bother you or like try to persuade you or anything like that, thats when it escalates...."


I feel like I should be getting self-righteously irate but I just can’t stop laughing.
Kept hearing all the jokes about World of Warcraft wankage but never bothered to actually look for myself before. Once more courtesy of Fandom Wank.
I particularly like the fact that their argument is aided by the excessive use of punctuation and a lack of capitalization. Clear indication of a rational argument, of course.

Should really stop reading Fandom Wank and get on with this essay...

( Now with excerpts )

Essay: because it’s always about the rich isolationists

Civic-republican tradition of citizenship virtue?
Old money versus new money. That’s all it boils down to. Entrepreneurs versus rich land-owning bastards.

Bet they’re rich isolationist land-owning bastards too.
*headdesk*